Why 'climategate' won't stop greens

Even the Canadians are questioning AGW.

An article in the Ottawa Sun has a go.

If you're wondering how the robot-like march of the world's politicians towards Copenhagen can possibly continue in the face of the scientific scandal dubbed "climategate," it's because Big Government, Big Business and Big Green don't give a s*** about "the science."

They never have.

I must say I agree with the above sentiment.

Now they and their media shills -- who sneered that all who questioned their phony "consensus" were despicable "deniers," the moral equivalent of those who deny the Holocaust -- are the ones in denial about the enormity of the scandal enveloping them.

We have our own homegrown media shill. The Beeb spring to mind?

So they desperately try to portray it as the routine "messy" business of science, lamely insisting, "nothing to see here folks, move along."

Pretty much everything that happens in this country is met with that sentence these days.

The moment they convinced politicians the way to avert the End of Days was to put a price on emitting carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, the unholy alliance of Big Government, Big Business and Big Green was forged.

Mmm. Pretty much what I've been thinking for a while.

What about saving the planet, you ask? This was never about saving the planet. This is about money and power. Your money. Their power.

Yep agree with that.

Anyway the whole article is here. I think we ought follow the advice at the end and let those in power in this country know how we feel

A load of hot air about AGW

Ed Begley gets into a shoutfest and can’t stop pointing his finger at Stuart Varney of Fox News: “You’re spewing your nonsense again …” says Begley. Stuart Varney only asked a simple question about the veracity of AGW. These fanatical greenies don't like being put on the spot

Rational debate. I think not.



I think he was a tad miffed.

The Climate change house of cards is starting to tumble

I see now that New Zealand's climate data is now coming under scrutiny.

The NIWA [the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric research], are refusing to release data. Are they today's CRU?

In New Zealand's case, the figures published on NIWA's [the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric research] website suggest a strong warming trend in New Zealand over the past century:

Their graph shows the predictable warming trend as does the CRU one.

But analysis of the raw climate data from the same temperature stations has just turned up a very different result:

Gone is the relentless rising temperature trend, and instead there appears to have been a much smaller growth in warming, consistent with the warming up of the planet after the end of the Little Ice Age in 1850.

The whole sorry story is here at TBR.cc

H/T to Watts up with that

UPDATE: Some Australian data may not be squeaky clean either.

Kill a cow, save the world. Cowgate, the story.

When I first heard about this, I must admit, I thought it was a spoof.

Here's the link. Read it and weep with laughter

Climategate continues

In this video you see a global alarmist wriggling on the hook



Now, I've got a download of the E mails and they make disturbing reading. Anyone want copies? They are hard to wade through, but the last ones are revealing in the attempt to cover up. If you want copies just E mail me.

H/T to Harry Hook for the Vid

Guess who?

A little guessing game.

Europe's climate change envoy revealed his controversial approach ahead of the UN Climate Change conference in Copenhagen in two weeks.

During a Commons debate, Mr xxxxxxxx, Rapporteur for Climate Change for the Council of Europe, told MPs: ‘I'm looking forward to that debate but I hope I've got the key to the door and (will) not let the b*****s out until they've done a deal.’

The answer is you've got to be joking

Is there even one of these bastards that are NOT on the European Gravy Train?

Bianca Jagger, expert on climate change.

The BBC are desperate to hang onto their position on climate change.

I've just watched The Daily Politics show, and been subjected to the most nauseating 10 mins of the week. Here we had Bianca Jagger postulating on how the Cumbrian floods were caused by climate change, even though one of the presenters did try and put it in perspective, by numerating all the floods Cumbria had suffered in the past.

It's really scraping the bottom of the barrel of the BBC global warming fraternity that they are resorting to B list celebrities to make their case with emotive films of such rubbish that I've just been subjected to.

The nauseating clip is here

Have a vote on the CRU

Two petitions over at the Englishman's blog

Sign if you are upset about the hiding of data at the CRU

The latest Paul Clarke update

I'm not going to go into detail, as the praise should go to Constantly Furious. For info, he has now enlisted the help of UKIP.

For the latest update, please visit the Constantly Furious Website

Well done CF

I'm glad I retired from The Royal Fleet Auxiliary

I used to work as a marine engineer with this outfit till last month.

On October 28, 2009, the armed Royal Fleet Auxiliary tanker Wave Knight met Somali pirates transferring the British couple Paul and Rachel Chandler from their yacht Lynn Rival to a hijacked Singaporean container vessel.

Hostage: Rachel Chandler and her Somali captors. The British couple has made a direct plea on video warning UK authorities they fear the 'kidnappers are losing patience' and may kill them

When warning shots from Wave Knight failed to deter the pirates, its 100-strong crew stood by and did . . . absolutely nothing.

The obsession with Health and Safety, Political correctness, and all the trapping of this modern world were stifling initiative. On the spot decisions were discouraged. Risk assessments, permits to work, Cossh regulations, preps for firing chits, etc. All these precluded prompt action.

Read the whole article here and weep.

Oh, and there was a two year argument, on whether ring bolts on the upper deck should be painted grey or white.

Grey argument: Must paint grey to prevent the enemy spotting us.
Counter argument: Radar has been in existence since WW2

White argument: Will prevent sailors stubbing their toes
Counter argument: Why don't they look where they're going