Why is it that those of us who have a healthy desire to see an honest debate on climate change meet with so much hostility?
Why is it taken to be proven that man is to blame for Global cooling/Global warming/Global climate disruption, etc, etc, by some computer models, when those models don’t agree with the observations?
Why do I get vilified by anonymous commenter's when I point out facts that I’ve gleaned from governments and renewable energy consortia, outlining the uncertainties and costs of these forms of energy? Is it because those commenter's have been so brainwashed that they are afraid, no, terrified, that they might have been hoodwinked into believing a lie?
I have three children and certainly don’t wish them a bad future. So all of you Anons out there. Why am I sceptical of the science?
Because I’m an engineer. No I'm not a scientist. However engineers have to think in an analytical manner otherwise nothing would work as it should. I had the laws of thermodynamics drummed into me from an early age and therefore know all about radiation, convection, and heat transfer.
Most of the comments I receive usually contain “Don’t you know the science is settled?” or “All the scientists agree”.
Well then, all you Anons. Prove it to me with verifiable facts. And no, I don’t mean copies of Al Gore’s “An inconvenient truth”, or the Hockey stick graph. They would cause me to slash my wrists in frustration.
And if you dare cite the myth of the dying polar bears…….
That’s me for now Oh righteous ones. I’m going to do something truly despicable to you.
I’m going to smoke a cigarette.