Pony steak anyone?

My poor little pony.

Rejection

I’d give him a job.

There are two sides to the story on Climate Change.

On one side we have Slate with an infographic with the caption :

 

”How to Win Any Climate Change Argument
A flow chart for debating with denialists”

 

On the other we have a really delicious fisking of the graphic from Wendy McElroy:

“How to Lose a Climate Change Argument”

Her starting comment before she shreds the graphic:

“All I can say is, I pity the fool that tries to use that flowchart on me. Below the break, if this subject doesn't bore you to tears by now, is my fisking of their arguments.

The arguments seem to progress from right to left, so I'll address them in that order.”

Truly delightful.

Good excuse.

 

Seen in a street nowhere near me.

Ban it, Ban it.

 

Barking

Alcohol Concern.

Are we going to see the demise of this self righteous, bunch of Nu Puritans in the near future?

Cameron's minimum alcohol price plans to outlaw cheap drinks are 'dead in the water'

• A minister said rise would be 'inconceivable' when cost of living will be issue at next election

I’m hoping that this will happen now that they are not significantly sucking from the Government teat this year.

I notice that their accounts aren’t published for the financial year 2011 – 2012, but here is part of the Chairman’s address in the financial report 2010 – 2011

Sorry for the poor clarity, but their PDF for some reason disallowed me from cut and paste.

I must admit I do find that their chairman has quite a history for jumping on every bandwagon available. Could he not just work at one job and do it well. The rest of us strive to obtain that goal.

Hopefully these nannying fussbuckets are nearing the time that they’ll have to get out into the real world and see what the rest of us are having to deal with.

ASH. You’re next.

The British Energy Challenge

It seems that The Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) are a bit miffed that their message about AGW is not getting across to us plebs. Or if it is, and we’re just ignoring it for the fuckwittery that it is.

So they’ve decided that they need a bit of outside help to cajole the general public to accept their idiocy.

The Department of Energy and Climate Change (“the Department”) is inviting tenders for the development of a public engagement plan to generate greater popular acceptance of the need to move to a low-carbon energy system, preparing the public for the scale of the investment and change required in the UK’s energy system – The British Energy Challenge.

Alright it’s only a three month contrick contract paying £20,000, but it’s money that shouldn’t be frittered away.

When the whole global warming debacle is finally exposed in the public eye to be the hoax that it is. I would hope that they will be forced to keep the name DECC just to remind us what Tossers they are.

I admit it, I’m a banker

Sort of.

I left a link in a post to ZOPA.
Here’s what it does

Zopa is a marketplace for peer-to-peer lending. People lend and borrow money with each other, sidestepping the banks.

Peer-to-peer lending is a smarter, fairer and more human way of doing money. It's like borrowing and lending with your friends and family - except there are thousands of people you can lend and borrow with.
Both lenders and borrowers get better rates, because peer-to-peer lending is more efficient than the traditional banking model. Banks have massive overheads, with thousands of employees to pay and hundreds of branches to maintain. So they have to take large margins on the money that passes through them.
There's no smoke and mirrors here. Banks use your money to make even more money for themselves. They lend some of it out, gamble some of it on the price of tin or the Yen depreciating, and invest the rest in any other money-making schemes they can think of.

Now I’m a lender. To put it short and sweet, I put in, lets say £1000, and Zopa lends it out to a hundred borrowers at £10 each to minimise my risk.
Of course theirs always risk of someone defaulting. However looking at my defaulters today has given me an insight on how the habits of people have changed since the credit crunch of 2008.

Sorry about the poor image.

As you can see in 2009 there was only one default, but in 2010 there was a whopping 18. Then just three in 2011.
My take on it is that a lot of people struggled on and finally admitted defeat in 2010 with just a few managing to hold on till 2011.
I think that people have now pruned back their expenditure and are now balancing their expenditure against their income. I did expect quite a few defaults as quite a few borrowers reasons were “Consolidate existing debts”.

The only hope I can give from the figures above is that we have moved from the “I want it now society” into a more realistic “I’ll buy it when I’ve saved up for it” society. Just like it used to to be in Sensible Britain of the past.

At the moment in the “A” market I’m currently lending at 6%, but of course I don’t get a return of 6%. I have to pay a fee of 0.5% to Zopa and I also have to factor in a 1% default ratio. This gives me a pre-tax return of 4.5%.
If you try to get a loan from Natwest for a £1000 for instance, you will be charged a whopping 22.9% for the privilege.
.
So I can’t be an evil banker really. I don’t really make much myself, and help others in need. Maybe I should register myself as a charity!

*Everyone else seems to be able to.*

Pork

Ok?

Money under the mattress.

Well not quite.

A few years ago when I retired, I received a substantial lump sum as part of my retirement package. Now of course I couldn’t leave it in my current account, earning next to bugger all, so I looked around for various means of at least keeping my money abreast of inflation.

Some of the money went into unit trusts, some went into ZOPA, and some into a plethora of savings accounts in several different banks. (Eleven).

A fair few months ago I looked at my spread sheet (More about that later) and looked at one account which strangely I hadn’t noted a figure of amount invested, and thought I’d check the account online. (The last time I accessed it was over six months ago). However I couldn’t gain entry so I put it off to another day. A couple of months ago I tried again. Still no access.

Last year I paid a lot of money for my eldest daughter’ wedding and had drawn money from various accounts which I closed on completion. So I presumed till last week that this account must have been one of them and closed .

Not so.

Last week I received a phone call from an Indian call centre. (The bank was a British subsidiary of an Indian bank). The caller implied that my term deposit in the account that I thought was closed was no longer going to pay the interest, and would revert to a derisory amount , and would I like to switch to a new deal? For some reason I thought this was trying to get me to save with them. I hung up.

I’m a fool. (I’ve said it so you don’t have to).

However on Saturday I received an Email from the bank reiterating the same message that I received by phone, It also showed the capital that had been invested. (My eyes lit up).

This morning I phoned them up and found that the reason I’d been locked out of the account was because I’d not accessed it on line for six months. After verifying my details, (why  they need my cat’s middle name is beyond me?) I finally accessed my account.

It held over double what I thought I’d invested (Interest added). I didn’t know this as as I’d looked at the wrong bloody spread sheet. The up to date spread sheet, showed that it was a three year fixed rate deal.

I’m not going to say how much, as if I do, the kids will be around on the doorstep with their kids dressed in rags and barefoot, asking for a hand out. (Hi Lizi & Kat).

I now have a substantial buffer to ride out the economic slump. I can afford decent whisky again.

Motto: There’s no fool like an old fool.