Four leading internet service providers are to offer parents the option of blocking adult content when they subscribe.
The move is expected to be announced today by Prime Minister David Cameron as part of a campaign to tackle the sexualisation of childhood.
All in the name of “We must think of the cheeeeldren”.
Well, you dome headed politician scum, why can’t you leave the control of the internet to the people who should decide? They’re called P-A-R-E-N-T-S.
Anyhoo. How can you decide what is an explicit site or not? Are you going to firewall the national Gallery website, because it contains pictures of naked women?
Of course there has to be a Quango involved . What’s happened to that bonfire Dave? Lost the matches?
A new website, called Parentport, is being launched where parents can complain about television programmes, advertisements, products or services which they believe are unsuitable for children.
Ed Richards, chief executive of watchdog Ofcom, told the paper: "Seven UK media regulators have come together to develop a single website with a single aim - to help protect children from inappropriate material."
Sorry. I should have written SUPER quango.
How soon, dear reader, before you find you can’t access this blog due to the occasional sweary words used here.
The cold, dead hand, of the state in action.
First they came for the smokers
Then the drinkers
Then the fatties
Now the internet.
How typical of the Camermong .. yet again, fart-arsing about round the edges, whilst the major problems get ignored ..
ReplyDeleteHis personal anthem ought to be ..
"I'm busy doing nothing,
working the whole day through
Trying to find lots of things
not to do "
He's like one of those pathetic, contemptible spastics, who, on the outbreak of a punch-up .. was always ready, willing & able to hold someone's coat ..
Wanker !
I heard that porn channels (as decided by whoever) will be blocked and that to access them one had to "opt in", possibly by ticking a box marked "are you a pervert"
ReplyDelete"A new website, called Parentport, is being launched where parents can complain about television programmes, advertisements, products or services which they believe are unsuitable for children"
ReplyDeleteExcellent, I shall inundate them with complaints everytime a programme or advert is broadcast that supports global warming/climate change. Certainly unsuitable for children in that it does not demonstrate sound scientific method. Let's start using the Righteous's tools against them.
Now that's an idea Henry. One man's porn is another man's climate change.
ReplyDeleteI was going to suggest something along the same lines as Henry Crun: noise. Bury them with ridiculous but superficially plausible complaints, preferably involving government, public sector and nannying wowser charity webshites.
ReplyDeleteMore hypocrisy, the sexualisation of children has been a deliberate theme in some ' artistes' music videos for some time now, along with some very unsavoury symbolism, of course because its music aimed at children its cute, nothing to see here etc,will this be censored? Er, NO, 'cos they feed the parties coffers!
ReplyDelete"I heard that porn channels (as decided by whoever) will be blocked and that to access them one had to "opt in", possibly by ticking a box marked "are you a pervert" ..
ReplyDeleteIf they do go ahead with this ludicrous policy, I bet they won't dare block access to the Brown Hatter's porn .. too many Politicians, Ministers & MP's would be inconvenienced ..
All that said, further reading ..
://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2047651/New-curbs-internet-sleaze-protect-children-unsuitable-content.html
.. suggests that the government have been advised by industry experts that it would be impractical to apply the policy retrospectively .. it would seem that the only way to introduce it, is by applying it to people who take out new subscriptions with service providers ..
Inhabitants of Scunthorpe will inevitably 'censored'.
ReplyDeleteDespite millions of Euros being spent on promoting internet safety for children, only 14% of
ReplyDeleteparents across Europe have installed web filtering software to prevent their children from
seeing certain websites. The survey carried out by London School of Economics also found
that 40% of parents did realise that their child had seen sexual images online, while over half
of parents did not know that their child had received hurtful or abusive messages online. The
European Union is pushing ahead with legislative initiatives over the next year to make the
internet safer for children and address data collection practice and behavioural advertising.
source;
http://www.southwark.anglican.org/downloads/mu/Faith&Policy_Watch_Mar11.pdf
There is no end to the attempted meddling in the lives of families across the land by control freaks dressed up as do gooders aka THE RIGHTEOUS
Christianity and the EU. Two religions using each other to further their ambitions which are exactly the same.
Create FEAR
TAX people to keep them safe
LIVE high on the hog from the proceeds
Rinse, wash, repeat.
Sorry Bill. Your post got stuck in google's spam filter.
ReplyDeleteIronic.
ReplyDeleteIt's enormous that you are getting ideas from this piece of writing as well as from our dialogue made at this time.
ReplyDeleteAlso visit my web blog ; colon cleanse clinic in san jose
I have some ideas and want to recognise if to
ReplyDeletedelight sex without fleshlightl, cultured, unwavering and unassailable, as sensations and feelings of exit.
Casually, he genuinely chilling public orgasm, I'd stick out the terrific and inglorious naked walk abode.
My webpage :: fleshlight
Have you ever considered creating an e-book or guest authoring on other blogs?
ReplyDeleteI have a blog centered on the same subjects you discuss and would really like to have you
share some stories/information. I know my visitors would value your work.
If you're even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an email.
Feel free to surf to my homepage; grupa kreatywna
my website - grupa kreatywna